Monday, 28 February 2011

1,000 Sign Up to have Affairs


This article assumes fidelity to mean only having sex with one person at a time when this Christian definition of marriage is clearly not right for everyone – especially non-Christians. It also assumes that only the rigid Christian definition of marriage is the correct one and that anyone who does not subscribe to it is a sexual failure and to be pathologized by scientific-sounding pseudo-sex therapy.

Extra-marital affairs from rigidly-defined Christian marriages are often a way out of marriages that could never have worked because they were formalistic and obsessed with appearances rather than content – a typical White Christian marriage, in fact. They can be an excellent means of the very self-discovery Christians try to deny their adherents in order to better and more easily control their lives. Once the self is discovered the Christian way of doing things soon comes to be revealed as no more than a superstitious cult that offers no answers to life's existential problems – only a refuge from them. Christians spend so much time interfering in others' sexual choices that most cannot work out whom they would like to have sex with so end-up having soulless sex. If Christians were not so sex-obsessed, then these problems would not arise.

Moreover, Whites claim that only marrying for love is a valid reason for getting married. Yet, how many people actually do this rather than marrying because they do not want others to think them gay, or for money or for regular sex?

Like all White culture's attempt to control the sexuality of Whites, Christianity relies on conflating the personal with the political in order to control both behavior and White people's minds. Christians introduced politics into the bedroom by claiming that the anus is not to be sexually penetrated, the vagina only so long as you do not enjoy it and the mouth they are not too sure about. Christians want political power (to compensate for their non-existent spiritual power) but can only achieve this by colonizing the minds of its adherents with nonsense like homosexuality is an abomination and masturbation a sin; explaining why there are so many sex-starved White Christians. If Christians truly loved their fellow Man they would not condemn but attempt to build bridges of understanding between different sexual groups. But this is wishful-thinking of course. Anyone poking their nose into the sex lives of others is not only emotionally-suppressed and envious but also confuses the personal with the political because they are so lonely that they want to legislate for love. And if they cannot obtain that, to legislate for obedience to their own sexual perversion: Erotophobia. (Is this why White women are so shit in bed?)

The reason Western marriage has failed is that most people are simply not monogamous and because non-monogamous marriages are not recognized as valid in the West. The inability of Whites to be truly multicultural and diverse – even to their own sexual advantage – is writ large here in their being willing to put up with marriages that do not work for the sake of form. No wonder so many married Whites look miserable.

To claim that marriage is the 'building block of society' is nonsense since the kind of marriage and the kind of society is not specified. This is simply talk about Christian marriage and Christian society which does not explain why Whites have the highest divorce rates in the world along with even higher adultery, porn-consumption and prostitute-use rates. Like all resentful Christians realizing that the Christian message of unhappiness-is-next-to-godliness, Father Leo Mooney claims people do not take marriage seriously when, in reality, it is only Christian marriage they do not take seriously. Like everyone else in the world, Whites take sex very seriously, they just want to enjoy it more and refuse to see it as just procreational - as White Christians do. Recreational sex can be great with one partner or more of either sex – there need be no exclusive love present for this to be the case.

Joyce Walters is clearly a charlatan and offers no statistics to support her claims. Although she is right that married men (75%) are more unfaithful than married women (40%), in their lifetimes, women in the UK have more sexual partners than men which disproves her claim that: 'Women tend not to be so casual about sex'. Her role here is to pathologize those the Christians cannot punish directly (since adultery is no longer a UK crime) by claiming they are mentally ill, when it is really those Christians who believe in this claptrap who are cognitively-impaired.

This article is completely non-objective and merely serves to scapegoat others who do not subscribe to one's own way of thinking. It tries to do this to bolster a way of thinking that does not, and never did, work. Whites having fun are deeply-resented by those who fear to discover their true sexuality. If Whites wish to save their form of marriage, it would be better to make it more user-friendly rather than the spiritually-impossible and sexually-empty goal it currently is. White Christians are the ultimate closet-heterosexuals because they accept the fact of sex reluctantly as a fleshy distraction from their alleged spirituality and because they believe that gynophobia will control women and stop them from inciting men to have sex with them. The misogyny of this position is clear and the author of this piece must therefore hate and fear her own femininity.

Copyright © 2011 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog ( is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved. Frank TALKER is also the author of Sweaty Socks: A Treatise on the Inevitability of Toe Jam in Hot Weather (East Cheam Press: Groper Books, 1997) and is University of Bullshit Professor Emeritus of Madeupology.

No comments:

Post a Comment

about me:

My photo

Frank TALKER - Truth-Teller